Role and Functions of the Art Criticism in Kyiv Contemporary Art World in the Late 20<sup>th</sup>- Early 21<sup>st</sup> Century

Olesia Sobkovych

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijla.20210906.29

| Peer-Reviewed

Role and Functions of the Art Criticism in Kyiv Contemporary Art World in the Late 20^th- Early 21^st Century

Olesia Sobkovych

Published in International Journal of Literature and Arts (Volume 9, Issue 6)

Received: 18 November 2021 Accepted: 17 December 2021 Published: 29 December 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The history of the art criticism origin and development testifies / shows the significant influence of the new art practices emergence and socio-cultural transformations on the art criticism changes, on the evolution of its concept and functional specificity. Similar transformations are noticeable in the Ukrainian visual art space of the late XX - early XXI century. In the new socio-political circumstances, along with the transformations of artistic life, the modification of the media, the art criticism also undergoes certain changes; these facts encourage us to study it much deeper, particularly to comprehend its status in the sociocultural space. It was discovered that during the late XX - early XXI centuries the art criticism is undergoing significant transformations caused by local and global factors. Among the global factors that influenced the change of epistemological principles / attitudes (change in the interpretation of truth, its criteria and reliability of knowledge) are the aesthetic guidelines of postmodernism. They, together with the development of the multimedia technologies, the Internet lead to the blurring of boundaries between the subjects of the artistic process and to the change of the relationship between critics, artists and viewers. Local factors influencing the activities of art criticism are active involvement in artistic life and the growing role of art market representatives, who perform functions related to criticism, but, in contrast, are guided by business rules and interests. It encourages critics to expand the boundaries of their activities, turning to curatorial and editorial work, which partially ensures the importance preservation of their role in the sociocultural sphere. However, the “partylike” existence principle of the artistic environment in Ukraine, marketing factors and the laws of the art market cancel the growing importance of sociocultural influence of unbiased, professional criticism. A significant reduction of serious unbiased materials expressing the independence of their authors (thorough analysis and professional interpretation of artistic processes) leads to the active filling of this niche with amateur publications and non-critical genres, art journalism, which creates controversy / contradictory in treating criticism as a definitive key to the artistic practices validity.

Published in	International Journal of Literature and Arts (Volume 9, Issue 6)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijla.20210906.29
Page(s)	392-397
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Art Criticism, Sociocultural Space, Contemporary Art

References

[1]	Barabanov E. To the critics of criticism. Art magazine. 2003. № 30. pp. 48–49. http://xz.gif.ru/numbers/4849/kritika-kritiki.
[2]	Groys B. Any intellectual activity is built on risk. Den’ (Day). 2012. № 77. p. 15.
[3]	Pykhtina T. Truth as social significance. Vestnik of Novosibirsk state university of economics and management, 2012. № 3. pp. 290–291.
[4]	Arutiunian Yu. Contemporary art criticism: judgment and interpretation. Vestnik of Saint-Petersburg State University of Culture. 2017. № 1 (30) March. pp. 177.
[5]	Yatsiv R. Substitute genres of art criticism: regularity or loss of functions. Mystetsvoznavstvo (Art history). Lviv, 2009. p. 42.
[6]	Shmagalo R. Art culture criticism: current status and prospects. Mystetsvoznavstvo (Art history). Lviv, 2009. p. 11.
[7]	Sontag S. Against interpretation and other essays. 2014. p. 2. https://freelibrary.ru/bookread/293045-syuzen-sontag-protiv-interpretacii-i-drugie-esse/page-4.
[8]	Pidlypska A. Art criticism and art history in modern circumstances. Bulletin of the National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts. Kyiv, 2019. p. 381.
[9]	Graw, I. High price: art between the market and celebrity culture. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press, 2016. p. 147.
[10]	Kremynskyi V. Peculiarities of the hermeneutic interpretation of the artwork. Kultura narodov Prichernomoria (Culture of Black Sea coast people). 2000. Nu. 14. pp. 120-126. http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/bitstream/handle/123456789/94743/35-Kreminskiy.pdf?sequence=1.
[11]	Levitska M. Research of an artwork: description, analysis, interpretation. Artes. 2015 https://artes-almanac.com/opys_analiz_interpretacija/.
[12]	Stafetskaia M. Social status and issues of the art criticism methodology. Current issues of methodology of the contemporary art history. K.: Nauka, 1983. p. 289.
[13]	Sobkovych, O. Creativity of Valerii Hehamian in the context of art criticism in Kyiv. Art: metamorphoses and discourses: materials for the international scientific conference, Kyiv, September 9-10, 2021. Kyiv, 2021. p. 95.
[14]	Kostiuchenko N. Between delight and bias. Kurier muz (Courier of muses). Kyiv, 1992. № 3. p. 4.
[15]	Sobkovych, O. Creativity of Valerii Hehamian in the context of art criticism in Kyiv. Art: metamorphoses and discourses: materials for the international scientific conference, Kyiv, September 9-10, 2021. Kyiv, 2021. p. 94.
[16]	Bilyk N. (Interviewee) & Sobkovych O. (Interviewer) (2015). Are the artist and critic ready for criticism? Obrazotvorche mystetstvo (Fine Arts), 2015. №1. p. 84.
[17]	Krauss R. The current state of art criticism. Part 3. Artguide, 2017. URL: https://artguide.com/posts/1386.
[18]	Saenkova L. Literary and artistic criticism and journalism: historical and cultural context. Vestnik of the Belarusian State University. Series 4, Philology. Journalism. Pedagogy. 2009. № 1. p. 88.
[19]	Sadovnikov A. Literary and television criticism on the Internet: specifics, typology, principles of interaction: dissertation abstract of PhD of philological science: 10.01.01. Ivanovo, 2011. 22 p.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Olesia Sobkovych. (2021). Role and Functions of the Art Criticism in Kyiv Contemporary Art World in the Late 20th- Early 21st Century. International Journal of Literature and Arts, 9(6), 392-397. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20210906.29

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Olesia Sobkovych. Role and Functions of the Art Criticism in Kyiv Contemporary Art World in the Late 20th- Early 21st Century. Int. J. Lit. Arts 2021, 9(6), 392-397. doi: 10.11648/j.ijla.20210906.29

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Olesia Sobkovych. Role and Functions of the Art Criticism in Kyiv Contemporary Art World in the Late 20th- Early 21st Century. Int J Lit Arts. 2021;9(6):392-397. doi: 10.11648/j.ijla.20210906.29

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijla.20210906.29,
  author = {Olesia Sobkovych},
  title = {Role and Functions of the Art Criticism in Kyiv Contemporary Art World in the Late 20th- Early 21st Century},
  journal = {International Journal of Literature and Arts},
  volume = {9},
  number = {6},
  pages = {392-397},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijla.20210906.29},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20210906.29},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijla.20210906.29},
  abstract = {The history of the art criticism origin and development testifies / shows the significant influence of the new art practices emergence and socio-cultural transformations on the art criticism changes, on the evolution of its concept and functional specificity. Similar transformations are noticeable in the Ukrainian visual art space of the late XX - early XXI century. In the new socio-political circumstances, along with the transformations of artistic life, the modification of the media, the art criticism also undergoes certain changes; these facts encourage us to study it much deeper, particularly to comprehend its status in the sociocultural space. It was discovered that during the late XX - early XXI centuries the art criticism is undergoing significant transformations caused by local and global factors. Among the global factors that influenced the change of epistemological principles / attitudes (change in the interpretation of truth, its criteria and reliability of knowledge) are the aesthetic guidelines of postmodernism. They, together with the development of the multimedia technologies, the Internet lead to the blurring of boundaries between the subjects of the artistic process and to the change of the relationship between critics, artists and viewers. Local factors influencing the activities of art criticism are active involvement in artistic life and the growing role of art market representatives, who perform functions related to criticism, but, in contrast, are guided by business rules and interests. It encourages critics to expand the boundaries of their activities, turning to curatorial and editorial work, which partially ensures the importance preservation of their role in the sociocultural sphere. However, the “partylike” existence principle of the artistic environment in Ukraine, marketing factors and the laws of the art market cancel the growing importance of sociocultural influence of unbiased, professional criticism. A significant reduction of serious unbiased materials expressing the independence of their authors (thorough analysis and professional interpretation of artistic processes) leads to the active filling of this niche with amateur publications and non-critical genres, art journalism, which creates controversy / contradictory in treating criticism as a definitive key to the artistic practices validity.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Role and Functions of the Art Criticism in Kyiv Contemporary Art World in the Late 20th- Early 21st Century
AU  - Olesia Sobkovych
Y1  - 2021/12/29
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20210906.29
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijla.20210906.29
T2  - International Journal of Literature and Arts
JF  - International Journal of Literature and Arts
JO  - International Journal of Literature and Arts
SP  - 392
EP  - 397
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2331-057X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20210906.29
AB  - The history of the art criticism origin and development testifies / shows the significant influence of the new art practices emergence and socio-cultural transformations on the art criticism changes, on the evolution of its concept and functional specificity. Similar transformations are noticeable in the Ukrainian visual art space of the late XX - early XXI century. In the new socio-political circumstances, along with the transformations of artistic life, the modification of the media, the art criticism also undergoes certain changes; these facts encourage us to study it much deeper, particularly to comprehend its status in the sociocultural space. It was discovered that during the late XX - early XXI centuries the art criticism is undergoing significant transformations caused by local and global factors. Among the global factors that influenced the change of epistemological principles / attitudes (change in the interpretation of truth, its criteria and reliability of knowledge) are the aesthetic guidelines of postmodernism. They, together with the development of the multimedia technologies, the Internet lead to the blurring of boundaries between the subjects of the artistic process and to the change of the relationship between critics, artists and viewers. Local factors influencing the activities of art criticism are active involvement in artistic life and the growing role of art market representatives, who perform functions related to criticism, but, in contrast, are guided by business rules and interests. It encourages critics to expand the boundaries of their activities, turning to curatorial and editorial work, which partially ensures the importance preservation of their role in the sociocultural sphere. However, the “partylike” existence principle of the artistic environment in Ukraine, marketing factors and the laws of the art market cancel the growing importance of sociocultural influence of unbiased, professional criticism. A significant reduction of serious unbiased materials expressing the independence of their authors (thorough analysis and professional interpretation of artistic processes) leads to the active filling of this niche with amateur publications and non-critical genres, art journalism, which creates controversy / contradictory in treating criticism as a definitive key to the artistic practices validity.
VL  - 9
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Olesia Sobkovych

National Museum of the History of Ukraine in the Second World War, Memorial Complex, Kyiv, Ukraine

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Olesia Sobkovych. (2021). Role and Functions of the Art Criticism in Kyiv Contemporary Art World in the Late 20th- Early 21st Century. International Journal of Literature and Arts, 9(6), 392-397. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20210906.29

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Olesia Sobkovych. Role and Functions of the Art Criticism in Kyiv Contemporary Art World in the Late 20th- Early 21st Century. Int. J. Lit. Arts 2021, 9(6), 392-397. doi: 10.11648/j.ijla.20210906.29

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Olesia Sobkovych. Role and Functions of the Art Criticism in Kyiv Contemporary Art World in the Late 20th- Early 21st Century. Int J Lit Arts. 2021;9(6):392-397. doi: 10.11648/j.ijla.20210906.29

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijla.20210906.29,
  author = {Olesia Sobkovych},
  title = {Role and Functions of the Art Criticism in Kyiv Contemporary Art World in the Late 20th- Early 21st Century},
  journal = {International Journal of Literature and Arts},
  volume = {9},
  number = {6},
  pages = {392-397},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijla.20210906.29},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20210906.29},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijla.20210906.29},
  abstract = {The history of the art criticism origin and development testifies / shows the significant influence of the new art practices emergence and socio-cultural transformations on the art criticism changes, on the evolution of its concept and functional specificity. Similar transformations are noticeable in the Ukrainian visual art space of the late XX - early XXI century. In the new socio-political circumstances, along with the transformations of artistic life, the modification of the media, the art criticism also undergoes certain changes; these facts encourage us to study it much deeper, particularly to comprehend its status in the sociocultural space. It was discovered that during the late XX - early XXI centuries the art criticism is undergoing significant transformations caused by local and global factors. Among the global factors that influenced the change of epistemological principles / attitudes (change in the interpretation of truth, its criteria and reliability of knowledge) are the aesthetic guidelines of postmodernism. They, together with the development of the multimedia technologies, the Internet lead to the blurring of boundaries between the subjects of the artistic process and to the change of the relationship between critics, artists and viewers. Local factors influencing the activities of art criticism are active involvement in artistic life and the growing role of art market representatives, who perform functions related to criticism, but, in contrast, are guided by business rules and interests. It encourages critics to expand the boundaries of their activities, turning to curatorial and editorial work, which partially ensures the importance preservation of their role in the sociocultural sphere. However, the “partylike” existence principle of the artistic environment in Ukraine, marketing factors and the laws of the art market cancel the growing importance of sociocultural influence of unbiased, professional criticism. A significant reduction of serious unbiased materials expressing the independence of their authors (thorough analysis and professional interpretation of artistic processes) leads to the active filling of this niche with amateur publications and non-critical genres, art journalism, which creates controversy / contradictory in treating criticism as a definitive key to the artistic practices validity.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Role and Functions of the Art Criticism in Kyiv Contemporary Art World in the Late 20th- Early 21st Century
AU  - Olesia Sobkovych
Y1  - 2021/12/29
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20210906.29
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijla.20210906.29
T2  - International Journal of Literature and Arts
JF  - International Journal of Literature and Arts
JO  - International Journal of Literature and Arts
SP  - 392
EP  - 397
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2331-057X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20210906.29
AB  - The history of the art criticism origin and development testifies / shows the significant influence of the new art practices emergence and socio-cultural transformations on the art criticism changes, on the evolution of its concept and functional specificity. Similar transformations are noticeable in the Ukrainian visual art space of the late XX - early XXI century. In the new socio-political circumstances, along with the transformations of artistic life, the modification of the media, the art criticism also undergoes certain changes; these facts encourage us to study it much deeper, particularly to comprehend its status in the sociocultural space. It was discovered that during the late XX - early XXI centuries the art criticism is undergoing significant transformations caused by local and global factors. Among the global factors that influenced the change of epistemological principles / attitudes (change in the interpretation of truth, its criteria and reliability of knowledge) are the aesthetic guidelines of postmodernism. They, together with the development of the multimedia technologies, the Internet lead to the blurring of boundaries between the subjects of the artistic process and to the change of the relationship between critics, artists and viewers. Local factors influencing the activities of art criticism are active involvement in artistic life and the growing role of art market representatives, who perform functions related to criticism, but, in contrast, are guided by business rules and interests. It encourages critics to expand the boundaries of their activities, turning to curatorial and editorial work, which partially ensures the importance preservation of their role in the sociocultural sphere. However, the “partylike” existence principle of the artistic environment in Ukraine, marketing factors and the laws of the art market cancel the growing importance of sociocultural influence of unbiased, professional criticism. A significant reduction of serious unbiased materials expressing the independence of their authors (thorough analysis and professional interpretation of artistic processes) leads to the active filling of this niche with amateur publications and non-critical genres, art journalism, which creates controversy / contradictory in treating criticism as a definitive key to the artistic practices validity.
VL  - 9
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download