This paper relates diachronic to synchronic properties of the languages. The structural features in most of today’s languages are a result of the diachronic processes of language change. Most of the phonological changes especially the 7 to 5 vowel shift (in Bantu) left the remnants which still affect the languages today. This paper discusses this process in Runyambo which is among the languages which have shifted from 7 to 5 vowels. The evidence that Runyambo had 7 vowels is reflected from the phonological changes which are seen from Guthrie’s reconstructed terms to what we have today in Runyambo. Though the behavior seems diachronic, it is still seen synchronically today in the language. From the lexical data, it was realized that synchronic spirantization is similar to the diachronic spirantization. This suggests that we still have the remnants of the phonological environment which triggered the diachronic spirantization. Such remnants /į/ are found on the perfective –įre, the nominalizing -į, and causative –į/ -isį. However, the super close back vowel /ų/ was not found to cause the synchronic alterations in Runyambo. Its shifts are diachronic. The paper concludes that, though the two sounds got lost, their remnants still exist and are in complementary distribution with the remaining /i/ and /u/. Hence, though not found in the vowel inventories of Runyambo, their behavior especially that of /į/ are still found in some phonological contexts especially those on the said morphemes. Therefore, the shift from 7 to 5 vowels in Runyambo left out the same on the morphemes resulting into the synchronic phonological alterations we see today in Runyambo.
| Published in | International Journal of Literature and Arts (Volume 10, Issue 5) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijla.20221005.13 |
| Page(s) | 278-291 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Spirantization, Synchronic, Reconstruct, Vowels, Causative, Perfective
| [1] | Bastin, Y. (1983). La finale -IDE et l’imbrication en bantou. Annales, Série IN-8, Sciences Humaines. no. 114. Tervuren: Musée Royal de l’Afrique Centrale. |
| [2] | Bastin, Y. and Schadeberg T. (Eds). (2003) Bantu lexical reconstructions 3. Tervuren. Royal museum for central Africa. |
| [3] | Bhat, D. N. S, (1978). A general study of palatalization. Joseph, H. G. (Ed). Universals of human language. Vol. 2. Pp. 47-91. Stanforf, CA. Stanford University Press. |
| [4] | Bickmore, L. S. (1990). Branching nodes and prosodic categories: Evidence from Runyambo. S. Inkelas & D. Zek (Eds). The phonology syntax connection. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. |
| [5] | Bosteon, K. (2008). Bantu Sipirantization: morphologization, lexicalization and historical classification. Diachronica. No. 25. Vol. 3 pp 299-356. |
| [6] | Bosteon K. and Goes H. (2019). Was Proto-Kikongo a 5 or 7 vowel language? Bantu spirantization and Vowel merger in the Kikongo Language Cluster. Linguistique et langues Africaines. V. 5. 25-68. |
| [7] | Chebanne, A. M. (1993). The imbrication of suffixes in Setswana. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference on African Linguistics in Columbus. |
| [8] | Clements, G. N. (1976). Vowel harmony in nonlinear generative phonology: An autosegmental Model. Bloomington. Indiana University Linguistics club. |
| [9] | Connel, B. (2007). Mambila fricative vowels and Bantu spirantization. Africana Linguistica. Vol. 13. Pp 7-31. |
| [10] | Creissels D. (1999). Remarks on the sound correspondences between Proto-Bantu and Tswana (S.31), with particular attention to problems involving *j (or *y), į and sequences *NC. Jean-Marie, H. and Larry M. H. (Eds.). Bantu Historical Linguistics: theoretical and Empirical perspectives. 297-334. CSLI Publications. |
| [11] | Downing, L. J. (2001). Liquid spirantization in Jita. Malilime: Malawian Journal of Linguistics. Vol. 2. Pp. 1-27. |
| [12] | Guthrie, M. (1967-1971) Comparative Bantu: An introduction to the comparative Linguistics and prehistory of the Bantu languages, 2: Bantu prehistory, inventory and indexes. London. Gregg International. |
| [13] | Harford, C. & Malambe, G. (2017). An optimality theoretic perspective on perfective imbrication in SiSwati. Nordic Journal of African Studies. Vol. 26. No. 4. Pp 277-291. |
| [14] | Hyman L. (1999). The historical interpretation of vowel Harmon in Bantu. In Jean-Marie, H. and Larry M. H. (Eds.). Bantu Historical Linguistics: theoretical and Empirical perspectives. 235-296. CSLI Publications. |
| [15] | Hyman L. (2003a). Segmental Morphology. Nurse D. and Philipson G. (Eds). The Bantu Languages. Routledge. Pp 42-58. |
| [16] | Hyman L. (2003b), Sound Change, Misanalysis, and Analogy in the Bantu Causative. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics. Vol 24. No 1. Pp 55-90. |
| [17] | Kabuta, NS. (2006). Nkòngamyakù Cirubà. Mfwàlànsa. Ghent: Research Center of African Languages and Literature. |
| [18] | Kula, N. (2001). Imbrication in Bemba. E. Hume, N. Smith & J. Van de Weijer (eds.). Surface syllable structure and segment sequencing, HIL Ocassional papers. Pp. 102-116. |
| [19] | Maganga, C. and Schadeberg, T. C. (1992). Kinyamwezi: Grammar, texts, vocabulary. Cologne. Rüdiger Kӧppe. |
| [20] | Mathangwane, J. T. M. (1996). Phonetics and Phonology of Ikalanga: A diachronic and synchronic study. University of Califonia. PhD Dissertation. |
| [21] | Meddieson (2003) the Sounds of the Bantu Languages. Nurse and Philippson (eds.). The Bantu languages. Taylor and Francis Routledge. 15-41. |
| [22] | Meeussen, A. E. (1969). Bantu lexical reconstruction. Tervuren: Musee Royal de l’Afrique Centrale. |
| [23] | Meeussen, A. E. (1967). Bantu grammatical reconstructions. Annales du Musée Royal de l’Afrique Centrale, Série 8, Sciences Humaines. Vol. 61. Pp. 81-121. |
| [24] | Morrison M. (2012). Imbrication in Bena. A paper presented at the 43rd annual conference on African Linguistics. 15-17. |
| [25] | Mould, M. (1972). On reconstructing the modified base of Bantu verbs. Studies in African linguistics. Vol. 3. No. 1. Pp. 107-125. |
| [26] | Mpobela, L. (2018). Word categorization in Runyambo: A case of adjectives and adverbs. PhD Thesis. University of Dar es Salaam. |
| [27] | Mpobela, L. and Lusekelo A. (2019). Properties of the adjective category in Runyambo. South African Journal of African Languages. Vol. 40. No. 1. Pp. 1-32. |
| [28] | Rugemalira, J. M. (1993). Runyambo verb extensions and constraints on predicate structure. PhD Thesis. Berkeley: University of California. |
| [29] | Rugemalira, J. M. (2002). Orunyambo lexicon. LOT Publications Lexicon series 1. Dar es Salaam: LOT Project, University of Dar es Salaam. |
| [30] | Rugemalira, J. M. (2005). A grammar of Runyambo. LOT Publications Grammar Series 1. Dar es Salaam: LOT Project, University of Dar es Salaam. |
| [31] | Schadeberg, T. C. (1995). Spirantization and the 7-to-5 Vowel Merger in Bantu. M. Dominicy and D. Demolin (Eds). Sound change. Belgium Journal of Linguistics 9. Pp. 73-84. |
| [32] | Schadeberg, T. C. (2003). Historical linguistics. Nurse D. and Philipson G. (Eds). The Bantu Languages. Routledge. Pp 143-163. |
APA Style
Lea Mpobela. (2022). 7 to 5 Vowel Shift: Scars of the Lost Vowels in Runyambo. International Journal of Literature and Arts, 10(5), 278-291. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20221005.13
ACS Style
Lea Mpobela. 7 to 5 Vowel Shift: Scars of the Lost Vowels in Runyambo. Int. J. Lit. Arts 2022, 10(5), 278-291. doi: 10.11648/j.ijla.20221005.13
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijla.20221005.13,
author = {Lea Mpobela},
title = {7 to 5 Vowel Shift: Scars of the Lost Vowels in Runyambo},
journal = {International Journal of Literature and Arts},
volume = {10},
number = {5},
pages = {278-291},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijla.20221005.13},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20221005.13},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijla.20221005.13},
abstract = {This paper relates diachronic to synchronic properties of the languages. The structural features in most of today’s languages are a result of the diachronic processes of language change. Most of the phonological changes especially the 7 to 5 vowel shift (in Bantu) left the remnants which still affect the languages today. This paper discusses this process in Runyambo which is among the languages which have shifted from 7 to 5 vowels. The evidence that Runyambo had 7 vowels is reflected from the phonological changes which are seen from Guthrie’s reconstructed terms to what we have today in Runyambo. Though the behavior seems diachronic, it is still seen synchronically today in the language. From the lexical data, it was realized that synchronic spirantization is similar to the diachronic spirantization. This suggests that we still have the remnants of the phonological environment which triggered the diachronic spirantization. Such remnants /į/ are found on the perfective –įre, the nominalizing -į, and causative –į/ -isį. However, the super close back vowel /ų/ was not found to cause the synchronic alterations in Runyambo. Its shifts are diachronic. The paper concludes that, though the two sounds got lost, their remnants still exist and are in complementary distribution with the remaining /i/ and /u/. Hence, though not found in the vowel inventories of Runyambo, their behavior especially that of /į/ are still found in some phonological contexts especially those on the said morphemes. Therefore, the shift from 7 to 5 vowels in Runyambo left out the same on the morphemes resulting into the synchronic phonological alterations we see today in Runyambo.},
year = {2022}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - 7 to 5 Vowel Shift: Scars of the Lost Vowels in Runyambo AU - Lea Mpobela Y1 - 2022/10/11 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20221005.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ijla.20221005.13 T2 - International Journal of Literature and Arts JF - International Journal of Literature and Arts JO - International Journal of Literature and Arts SP - 278 EP - 291 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2331-057X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20221005.13 AB - This paper relates diachronic to synchronic properties of the languages. The structural features in most of today’s languages are a result of the diachronic processes of language change. Most of the phonological changes especially the 7 to 5 vowel shift (in Bantu) left the remnants which still affect the languages today. This paper discusses this process in Runyambo which is among the languages which have shifted from 7 to 5 vowels. The evidence that Runyambo had 7 vowels is reflected from the phonological changes which are seen from Guthrie’s reconstructed terms to what we have today in Runyambo. Though the behavior seems diachronic, it is still seen synchronically today in the language. From the lexical data, it was realized that synchronic spirantization is similar to the diachronic spirantization. This suggests that we still have the remnants of the phonological environment which triggered the diachronic spirantization. Such remnants /į/ are found on the perfective –įre, the nominalizing -į, and causative –į/ -isį. However, the super close back vowel /ų/ was not found to cause the synchronic alterations in Runyambo. Its shifts are diachronic. The paper concludes that, though the two sounds got lost, their remnants still exist and are in complementary distribution with the remaining /i/ and /u/. Hence, though not found in the vowel inventories of Runyambo, their behavior especially that of /į/ are still found in some phonological contexts especially those on the said morphemes. Therefore, the shift from 7 to 5 vowels in Runyambo left out the same on the morphemes resulting into the synchronic phonological alterations we see today in Runyambo. VL - 10 IS - 5 ER -
Email: