Morphological Mutability of Modern Critical Genres: Theatre Review as a Parody

Natallia Lysova

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijla.20231103.15

| Peer-Reviewed

Morphological Mutability of Modern Critical Genres: Theatre Review as a Parody

Natallia Lysova

Published in International Journal of Literature and Arts (Volume 11, Issue 3)

Received: 15 January 2022 Accepted: 8 February 2022 Published: 10 June 2023

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

It considers specific features of genre evolvement of theatre reviews. Analyzing theater review transformations from the 1960s to the 2020s, the author notes that understanding the changes in the morphology of a theatrical review can help study tendencies in the modern criticism in general, and in the parody genre in particular. Reading closely theatre reviews of the literary weekly “Literature and Art” of 1960 and those of the same literary weekly of the 2020s and of the social and political newspaper “SB. Belarus Today” of the recent years, the author underscores that, unlike in the 1960s, in the 2020s journalists seem to detach from the professional circle of problems. The research marks that criticism has come to respond to journalism materials themselves (self-criticism) as well as to the cultural and social context of modern art rather than to particular fiction texts, theatrical premiers as information agenda. It also highlights that criticism and parody have a lot in common through their journalistic nature: the analysis of artistic phenomena in the modern culture. Yet, recently, in the changing medium space, criticism makes parody not fiction or journalistic text, but the communicative process, which has created some new roles of the critic, the author and the reader. It concludes that social and cultural situation around theatre determines the changes in the genre of theatre reviews in the modern outlets, putting them into pre-journalistic phase or literary-educational mode of associations and contexts. As a result, both viewers and critics develop new qualities.

Published in	International Journal of Literature and Arts (Volume 11, Issue 3)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijla.20231103.15
Page(s)	127-131
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Parody, Theatre, Model, Imitation, Parodic Person, Criticism, Review, Genre, Culture

References

[1]	Gruzdeva, M. M. Soviet and modern theater reviews as a reflection of their time / Margarita Gruzdeva // Moscow University Bulletin. Series 10. Journalism. 2017. №6. – p. 144-161.
[2]	Vladimirova, T. N., Morozov, R. P. Issues of classification of literary-publicistic genres in the science of journalism / Tatyana Vladimirova, Roman Morozov // Science and School, 2019. - No. 5. – p. 11-15.
[3]	Keshisheva, L. On New and Old Forms of Theater Criticism/ Liza Keshisheva //Theatre. - No. 41, 2020 // http://oteatre.info/o-novyh-i-staryh-formah-teatralnoj-kritiki/ - visited on 01.31.22.
[4]	Litvina, D. V. Theater and theater criticism in the culture of Russian society: dissertation abstract for the degree of candidate of cultural studies; specialty 24.00.01 / Litvina Dina Vladimirovna; [Omsk state tech. university]. – Omsk, 2016 – P. 24.
[5]	Tertychny, A. A. Genres of periodicals: textbook /A. A. Tertychny. - M.: Aspect Press, 2000. - 312 p.; Straltsou, B. V. Method and genre. Fundamentals of journalist’s creative work: a study guide / B. V. Straltsou. - Minsk: BSU, 2002 – P. 18.
[6]	Chernikova E. V. Fundamentals of journalist’s creative work: a study guide. - 2nd ed., Rev. and additional – M.: School of publishing and media business, 2012 – P. 414.
[7]	Orlova, T. D. The phenomenon of the development of genres in the context of current journalism / Tatyana Orlova // EB BSU: Social Sciences: Mass Communication. Journalism. Mass media, 2018, - С.28-39// https://elib.bsu.by/bitstream/123456789/192674/1/28-39.pdf - visited on 01.31.22
[8]	Vladimirova, T. N. Literary-publicistic journalism: to the theory of the issue / Tatiana Vladimirova // Science and School. - No. 3, 2019. – p. 54-59.
[9]	Gurevich, S. M. Newspaper: yesterday, today, tomorrow: textbook for universities / Semyon Gurevich. - M. Aspect Press, 2014 – P. 288.
[10]	The kind spectator in the 9th row. You don’t have to be a Tristan/ The kind spectator in the 9th row // SB. Belarus Today. –05.12.2017: https://musicaltheatre.by/pressa/article_post/tristanom-mozhesh-ty-ne-byt-dobryy-zritel-v-9-m-ryadu-sb-belarus-segodnya-05-12-2017 – visited on 08.11.21.
[11]	Novikov V. L. A book on parody / V. L. Novikov. – M.: Sovietskiy pisatiel, 1989 – P. 544.
[12]	The kind spectator in the 9th row. Tired with the sun / The kind spectator in the 9th row// SB. Belarus Today. – 24.02.2021: http://bgmteatr.by/press/ – visited on 08.11.21.
[13]	Tynianov Y. N. On the parody // Tynianov Y. N. Poetics. The History of literature. Cinema. – M.: Nauka, 1977. – p. 284-310.
[14]	The kind spectator in the 9th row. “Evening”: reload / The kind spectator in the 9th row// SB. Belarus Today. – 23.06.2021: https://www.sb.by/articles/vecher-perezagruzka.html – visited on 08.11.21.
[15]	Tertychniy A. A. Genres of the periodic press: educational materials for universities / Tertychniy A. A. – Moscow: Aspect Press, 200. 312 p. – e-text: http://evartist.narod.ru/text2/06.htm#%D0%B7_04 – visited on 29.08.21.
[16]	Akhramchuk N. Parody. If Shakespear were my contemporary, he would be reviewed this way / N. Akhremchuk // Litaratura i mastatstva. – 16/09.1960 – P. 4.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Natallia Lysova. (2023). Morphological Mutability of Modern Critical Genres: Theatre Review as a Parody. International Journal of Literature and Arts, 11(3), 127-131. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20231103.15

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Natallia Lysova. Morphological Mutability of Modern Critical Genres: Theatre Review as a Parody. Int. J. Lit. Arts 2023, 11(3), 127-131. doi: 10.11648/j.ijla.20231103.15

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Natallia Lysova. Morphological Mutability of Modern Critical Genres: Theatre Review as a Parody. Int J Lit Arts. 2023;11(3):127-131. doi: 10.11648/j.ijla.20231103.15

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijla.20231103.15,
  author = {Natallia Lysova},
  title = {Morphological Mutability of Modern Critical Genres: Theatre Review as a Parody},
  journal = {International Journal of Literature and Arts},
  volume = {11},
  number = {3},
  pages = {127-131},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijla.20231103.15},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20231103.15},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijla.20231103.15},
  abstract = {It considers specific features of genre evolvement of theatre reviews. Analyzing theater review transformations from the 1960s to the 2020s, the author notes that understanding the changes in the morphology of a theatrical review can help study tendencies in the modern criticism in general, and in the parody genre in particular. Reading closely theatre reviews of the literary weekly “Literature and Art” of 1960 and those of the same literary weekly of the 2020s and of the social and political newspaper “SB. Belarus Today” of the recent years, the author underscores that, unlike in the 1960s, in the 2020s journalists seem to detach from the professional circle of problems. The research marks that criticism has come to respond to journalism materials themselves (self-criticism) as well as to the cultural and social context of modern art rather than to particular fiction texts, theatrical premiers as information agenda. It also highlights that criticism and parody have a lot in common through their journalistic nature: the analysis of artistic phenomena in the modern culture. Yet, recently, in the changing medium space, criticism makes parody not fiction or journalistic text, but the communicative process, which has created some new roles of the critic, the author and the reader. It concludes that social and cultural situation around theatre determines the changes in the genre of theatre reviews in the modern outlets, putting them into pre-journalistic phase or literary-educational mode of associations and contexts. As a result, both viewers and critics develop new qualities.},
 year = {2023}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Morphological Mutability of Modern Critical Genres: Theatre Review as a Parody
AU  - Natallia Lysova
Y1  - 2023/06/10
PY  - 2023
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20231103.15
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijla.20231103.15
T2  - International Journal of Literature and Arts
JF  - International Journal of Literature and Arts
JO  - International Journal of Literature and Arts
SP  - 127
EP  - 131
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2331-057X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20231103.15
AB  - It considers specific features of genre evolvement of theatre reviews. Analyzing theater review transformations from the 1960s to the 2020s, the author notes that understanding the changes in the morphology of a theatrical review can help study tendencies in the modern criticism in general, and in the parody genre in particular. Reading closely theatre reviews of the literary weekly “Literature and Art” of 1960 and those of the same literary weekly of the 2020s and of the social and political newspaper “SB. Belarus Today” of the recent years, the author underscores that, unlike in the 1960s, in the 2020s journalists seem to detach from the professional circle of problems. The research marks that criticism has come to respond to journalism materials themselves (self-criticism) as well as to the cultural and social context of modern art rather than to particular fiction texts, theatrical premiers as information agenda. It also highlights that criticism and parody have a lot in common through their journalistic nature: the analysis of artistic phenomena in the modern culture. Yet, recently, in the changing medium space, criticism makes parody not fiction or journalistic text, but the communicative process, which has created some new roles of the critic, the author and the reader. It concludes that social and cultural situation around theatre determines the changes in the genre of theatre reviews in the modern outlets, putting them into pre-journalistic phase or literary-educational mode of associations and contexts. As a result, both viewers and critics develop new qualities.
VL  - 11
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Natallia Lysova

Faculty of Journalism, Belarusian State University, Minsk, The Republic of Belarus

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Natallia Lysova. (2023). Morphological Mutability of Modern Critical Genres: Theatre Review as a Parody. International Journal of Literature and Arts, 11(3), 127-131. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20231103.15

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Natallia Lysova. Morphological Mutability of Modern Critical Genres: Theatre Review as a Parody. Int. J. Lit. Arts 2023, 11(3), 127-131. doi: 10.11648/j.ijla.20231103.15

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Natallia Lysova. Morphological Mutability of Modern Critical Genres: Theatre Review as a Parody. Int J Lit Arts. 2023;11(3):127-131. doi: 10.11648/j.ijla.20231103.15

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijla.20231103.15,
  author = {Natallia Lysova},
  title = {Morphological Mutability of Modern Critical Genres: Theatre Review as a Parody},
  journal = {International Journal of Literature and Arts},
  volume = {11},
  number = {3},
  pages = {127-131},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijla.20231103.15},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20231103.15},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijla.20231103.15},
  abstract = {It considers specific features of genre evolvement of theatre reviews. Analyzing theater review transformations from the 1960s to the 2020s, the author notes that understanding the changes in the morphology of a theatrical review can help study tendencies in the modern criticism in general, and in the parody genre in particular. Reading closely theatre reviews of the literary weekly “Literature and Art” of 1960 and those of the same literary weekly of the 2020s and of the social and political newspaper “SB. Belarus Today” of the recent years, the author underscores that, unlike in the 1960s, in the 2020s journalists seem to detach from the professional circle of problems. The research marks that criticism has come to respond to journalism materials themselves (self-criticism) as well as to the cultural and social context of modern art rather than to particular fiction texts, theatrical premiers as information agenda. It also highlights that criticism and parody have a lot in common through their journalistic nature: the analysis of artistic phenomena in the modern culture. Yet, recently, in the changing medium space, criticism makes parody not fiction or journalistic text, but the communicative process, which has created some new roles of the critic, the author and the reader. It concludes that social and cultural situation around theatre determines the changes in the genre of theatre reviews in the modern outlets, putting them into pre-journalistic phase or literary-educational mode of associations and contexts. As a result, both viewers and critics develop new qualities.},
 year = {2023}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Morphological Mutability of Modern Critical Genres: Theatre Review as a Parody
AU  - Natallia Lysova
Y1  - 2023/06/10
PY  - 2023
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20231103.15
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijla.20231103.15
T2  - International Journal of Literature and Arts
JF  - International Journal of Literature and Arts
JO  - International Journal of Literature and Arts
SP  - 127
EP  - 131
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2331-057X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20231103.15
AB  - It considers specific features of genre evolvement of theatre reviews. Analyzing theater review transformations from the 1960s to the 2020s, the author notes that understanding the changes in the morphology of a theatrical review can help study tendencies in the modern criticism in general, and in the parody genre in particular. Reading closely theatre reviews of the literary weekly “Literature and Art” of 1960 and those of the same literary weekly of the 2020s and of the social and political newspaper “SB. Belarus Today” of the recent years, the author underscores that, unlike in the 1960s, in the 2020s journalists seem to detach from the professional circle of problems. The research marks that criticism has come to respond to journalism materials themselves (self-criticism) as well as to the cultural and social context of modern art rather than to particular fiction texts, theatrical premiers as information agenda. It also highlights that criticism and parody have a lot in common through their journalistic nature: the analysis of artistic phenomena in the modern culture. Yet, recently, in the changing medium space, criticism makes parody not fiction or journalistic text, but the communicative process, which has created some new roles of the critic, the author and the reader. It concludes that social and cultural situation around theatre determines the changes in the genre of theatre reviews in the modern outlets, putting them into pre-journalistic phase or literary-educational mode of associations and contexts. As a result, both viewers and critics develop new qualities.
VL  - 11
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download