With China's rapid economic and social development, the welfare protection of financial expenditure on people's livelihood is gaining more and more attention from the public, and improving the efficiency of financial expenditure is an important means to enhance government performance and people's satisfaction. This paper uses a three-stage DEA approach to measure and analyse the efficiency of local education and healthcare expenditure in Shanghai, and the study finds that environmental factors have a significant impact on financial expenditure efficiency. After excluding environmental and random factors, this paper calculates the true efficiency values of education and healthcare expenditure in Shanghai from 2015 to 2019 by three-stage DEA model, along with the total factor productivity of the true efficiency values using the Malmquist index method. The results show that the difference in the overall efficiency of people's livelihood fiscal expenditures in Shanghai is caused by technical efficiency, while the technological progress index is the main factor that leads to a decrease in the efficiency of total factor expenditures year by year. In terms of the overall trend, the adjusted overall efficiency has been increasing with the change of years, with the average value rising from a low of 0.839 in 2016 to 0.941 in 2019, an increase of more than 0.1, indicating that the efficiency of the Shanghai government's resource allocation is improving over time. Therefore, local governments should focus on improving the structure and management efficiency of fiscal funds, improving the level of budgeting and continuously improving performance management.
Published in | Science Innovation (Volume 10, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.si.20221002.15 |
Page(s) | 50-56 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Three-Stage DEA, Keyword Two, Malmquist Index
[1] | 刘彦华.2021中国现代公共服务发展指数64.0哪项公共服务最让人满意[J]. 小康, 2021 (07): 84-86。 |
[2] | 才国伟,钱金保.中国地方政府的财政支出与财政效率竞争[J]. 统计研究,2011, 28 (10): 36-46。 |
[3] | 徐超,庞雨蒙,刘迪.地方财政压力与政府支出效率——基于所得税分享改革的准自然实验分析[J]. 经济研究, 2020, 55 (06): 138-154。 |
[4] | Worthington, A. C. Cost Efficiency in Australian Local Government: A Comparative Analysis of Mathematical Programming and Econometric Approaches [J]. Financial Accountability & Management, 2000, 16 (3): 201-223. |
[5] | 姜扬.我国民生性财政支出对经济发展的影响研究[J].经济纵横, 2019 (05): 87-93。 |
[6] | 邢文妍.财政透明度对地方财政支出效率的影响分析[J].财经问题研究, 2020 (11): 89-99。 |
[7] | 刘树鑫,杨森平.财政纵向失衡会影响地方政府支出效率吗[J]. 当代财经, 2021 (07): 38-50。 |
[8] | 孙玉栋,席毓.影响我国地方政府财政支出效率的因素研究——基于财政、晋升和发展压力的视角[J].经济理论与经济管理, 2021, 41 (06): 37-49。 |
[9] | 杨野,常懿心.地方政府驻地迁移与财政支出效率[J].经济论, 2021 (04): 131-144。 |
[10] | 谭德凯,田利辉,李亭亭.高房价会损害地方政府财政支出效率吗[J]. 当代财经, 2020 (02): 40-51。 |
[11] | 王芳,刘红芹,陈硕.官员激励与政府支出效率:来自地级市的证据[J]. 经济学报, 2021, 8 (03): 173-198。 |
[12] | 聂卓,席天扬,李力行.减税降费能促进地方政府提高财政支出效率吗?——来自“营改增”全面推广的证据[J]. 世界经济文汇, 2021 (06): 17-35。 |
[13] | Gupta. S, Verhoeven. M. The efficiency of government expenditure Experiences from Africa [J]. Journal of Policy Modeling, 2001, 23 (4): 433-467. |
[14] | Gavurova, B., Kocisova, K., Belas, L., & Krajcik, V. Relative efficiency of government expenditure on secondary education [J]. Journal of International Studies, 2017, 10 (2): 329-343. |
[15] | 亓寿伟,俞杰,陈雅文.中国基础教育支出效率及制度因素的影响——基于局部前沿效率方法的分析[J]. 财政研究, 2016 (06): 103-113。 |
[16] | 刘文玉.中国财政分权对政府卫生支出效率的影响——基于省级面板数据的分析[J]. 经济问题, 2018 (06): 45-52。 |
[17] | 崔志坤,张燕.财政分权、转移支付和地方福利性财政支出效率[J]. 财政研究, 2017 (05): 24-37。 |
[18] | 周子超.中国省级政府医疗卫生支出效率及其影响因素研究——基于新冠疫情背景下的反思[J]. 经济问题探索, 2021 (02): 49-65。 |
[19] | Charnes. A, Cooper. W. W, Rhodes. E. Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units [J], European Journal of Operation Research, 1978, 2 (6): 429-444. |
[20] | 王金秀,于井远.我国地方财政支出效率评价——基于三阶段DEA方法[J]. 中南财经政法大学学报, 2018 (05): 79-87。 |
APA Style
Li Hangjie, Bi Xinyu, Peng Qifei, Zheng Fanglin, Lan Jiaxin. (2022). Evaluation of the Efficiency of Local Welfare Expenditure —— Take Shanghai as an Example. Science Innovation, 10(2), 50-56. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20221002.15
ACS Style
Li Hangjie; Bi Xinyu; Peng Qifei; Zheng Fanglin; Lan Jiaxin. Evaluation of the Efficiency of Local Welfare Expenditure —— Take Shanghai as an Example. Sci. Innov. 2022, 10(2), 50-56. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20221002.15
AMA Style
Li Hangjie, Bi Xinyu, Peng Qifei, Zheng Fanglin, Lan Jiaxin. Evaluation of the Efficiency of Local Welfare Expenditure —— Take Shanghai as an Example. Sci Innov. 2022;10(2):50-56. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20221002.15
@article{10.11648/j.si.20221002.15, author = {Li Hangjie and Bi Xinyu and Peng Qifei and Zheng Fanglin and Lan Jiaxin}, title = {Evaluation of the Efficiency of Local Welfare Expenditure —— Take Shanghai as an Example}, journal = {Science Innovation}, volume = {10}, number = {2}, pages = {50-56}, doi = {10.11648/j.si.20221002.15}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20221002.15}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.si.20221002.15}, abstract = {With China's rapid economic and social development, the welfare protection of financial expenditure on people's livelihood is gaining more and more attention from the public, and improving the efficiency of financial expenditure is an important means to enhance government performance and people's satisfaction. This paper uses a three-stage DEA approach to measure and analyse the efficiency of local education and healthcare expenditure in Shanghai, and the study finds that environmental factors have a significant impact on financial expenditure efficiency. After excluding environmental and random factors, this paper calculates the true efficiency values of education and healthcare expenditure in Shanghai from 2015 to 2019 by three-stage DEA model, along with the total factor productivity of the true efficiency values using the Malmquist index method. The results show that the difference in the overall efficiency of people's livelihood fiscal expenditures in Shanghai is caused by technical efficiency, while the technological progress index is the main factor that leads to a decrease in the efficiency of total factor expenditures year by year. In terms of the overall trend, the adjusted overall efficiency has been increasing with the change of years, with the average value rising from a low of 0.839 in 2016 to 0.941 in 2019, an increase of more than 0.1, indicating that the efficiency of the Shanghai government's resource allocation is improving over time. Therefore, local governments should focus on improving the structure and management efficiency of fiscal funds, improving the level of budgeting and continuously improving performance management.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Evaluation of the Efficiency of Local Welfare Expenditure —— Take Shanghai as an Example AU - Li Hangjie AU - Bi Xinyu AU - Peng Qifei AU - Zheng Fanglin AU - Lan Jiaxin Y1 - 2022/05/26 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20221002.15 DO - 10.11648/j.si.20221002.15 T2 - Science Innovation JF - Science Innovation JO - Science Innovation SP - 50 EP - 56 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-787X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20221002.15 AB - With China's rapid economic and social development, the welfare protection of financial expenditure on people's livelihood is gaining more and more attention from the public, and improving the efficiency of financial expenditure is an important means to enhance government performance and people's satisfaction. This paper uses a three-stage DEA approach to measure and analyse the efficiency of local education and healthcare expenditure in Shanghai, and the study finds that environmental factors have a significant impact on financial expenditure efficiency. After excluding environmental and random factors, this paper calculates the true efficiency values of education and healthcare expenditure in Shanghai from 2015 to 2019 by three-stage DEA model, along with the total factor productivity of the true efficiency values using the Malmquist index method. The results show that the difference in the overall efficiency of people's livelihood fiscal expenditures in Shanghai is caused by technical efficiency, while the technological progress index is the main factor that leads to a decrease in the efficiency of total factor expenditures year by year. In terms of the overall trend, the adjusted overall efficiency has been increasing with the change of years, with the average value rising from a low of 0.839 in 2016 to 0.941 in 2019, an increase of more than 0.1, indicating that the efficiency of the Shanghai government's resource allocation is improving over time. Therefore, local governments should focus on improving the structure and management efficiency of fiscal funds, improving the level of budgeting and continuously improving performance management. VL - 10 IS - 2 ER -